posted by admin on Jun 26
The media’s reaction to Michael Jackson’s death has largely glossed over the past ten to twelve years of his life where his musical output was minimal and his legal troubles redefined him as a man-child living in a fantasy world. All this leads me to an interesting, or at the very least tactless, question: Are we better off with Michael Jackson dead?
For years he’s existed as a punch-line the media occasionally wheels out for the public to judge. Did he sustain our interest because we like to see others fail? Did his immense talent and artistic output keep us hoping that maybe, even after all these years, he had one more hit in him? Or were we witnessing a life so unusual it’s never been seen before and will likely never be seen again?
With his death Jackson enters an unusual arena of celebrity mythology where flaws only enrich your legacy. Never again will he appear in the tabloids the subject of some bizarre scandal that seems too crazy to not be true. We are free to use his legacy for our own selfish ends and spin him into whatever image we desire without worrying what he might do tomorrow.
His death allows the world to remember him as a musical genius and to listen to his music without thinking of the baggage recent years piled upon it. For his friends and family the death will be tragic. His fans will mourn him but when I see the same people holding a vigil after his death who turned out to offer support during his numerous trials I no longer see them as blindly devoted, insane people but as someone like me, mourning the loss of a flawed artist who brought happiness to millions.
There will always be the jokes and no one should forget the later part of his life whether as legal precedent or cautionary tale but this morning I listened to Michael Jackson and without a hint of guilt or irony I thought, “God damn, he was talented.” Now that’s not too bad a legacy.
So are we better off now that Michael Jackson has passed away? Apparently, I am.